The tag implication #66345 handjob -> hand_on_another's_penis is pending approval.
Reason: Unless there is a way to handjob someone without putting your hand on their penis.
Topic: Tag implication: handjob -> hand_on_another's_penis
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
should we consider removing the penile implication from handjob so that it might apply to pseudo-penile acts as well? (or, alternately, should we maybe consider pseudo-penile to be a subsect of penile despite pseudo-penis and penis being considered totally seperate? because, honestly, just making this one exception would probably make everything a lot easier in this subject.)
dba_afish said:
should we consider expanding removing the penile implication from handjob so that it might apply to pseudo-penile acts as well? (or, alternately, should we maybe consider pseudo-penile to be a subsect of penile despite pseudo-penis and penis being considered totally seperate?)
+1 to this as it can also apply to ovipositors imo
moonlit-comet said:
+1 to this as it can also apply to ovipositors imo
yeah, but an ovipositor that functions akin to a penis and can induce an orgasm and stuff is already considered a penis.