The tag implication #66344 slit_play -> genital_slit is pending approval.

Reason: Slit_play always involves a genital_slit. so it should imply such.

anal doesn't imply anus, penile doesn't imply penis, and the same is true for all the similar tags I know of. It's because you can assume such an act is happening in some situations, without seeing the part itself.
I don't see any reason slit_play would be special here.

scth said:
anal doesn't imply anus, penile doesn't imply penis, and the same is true for all the similar tags I know of. It's because you can assume such an act is happening in some situations, without seeing the part itself.
I don't see any reason slit_play would be special here.

On the other foot,
foot play -> foot fetish -> feet

Might be hard to tell that it even counts as slit play without a visible slit. anal and vaginal are usually apparent from the position, penile can be entirely inside an orifice so that the penis itself is not visible, etc. - but I’m struggling to imagine a valid slit_play situation that doesn’t involve a visible slit. The results for slit_play -genital_slit seem to be mostly either missing the slit tag or probably shouldn’t have been slit_play. A few of these probably should be tagged andromorph.

spe said:
...but I’m struggling to imagine a valid slit_play situation that doesn’t involve a visible slit. The results for slit_play -genital_slit seem to be mostly either missing the slit tag or probably shouldn’t have been slit_play. A few of these probably should be tagged andromorph.

It is more of a question on whether or not we should consider ambiguous_slit to be part of slit_play, since it is distinctly separate from genital_slit.

spe said:
Might be hard to tell that it even counts as slit play without a visible slit. anal and vaginal are usually apparent from the position, penile can be entirely inside an orifice so that the penis itself is not visible, etc. - but I’m struggling to imagine a valid slit_play situation that doesn’t involve a visible slit. The results for slit_play -genital_slit seem to be mostly either missing the slit tag or probably shouldn’t have been slit_play. A few of these probably should be tagged andromorph.

post #2879101 <- only clear example I could find. Penis is visible, but slit is blocked by hand.
post #1344817 <- higher up than would be expected for a pussy?

[Edited to replace second image with a more clear example] Reverting edit because I'm stupid and the slit was definitely visible in it.

crocogator said:
post #2879101 <- only clear example I could find. Penis is visible, but slit is blocked by hand.

how can you tell that that dragon has a genital slit and not a cloaca?

smallgreybird said:
how can you tell that that dragon has a genital slit and not a cloaca?

I believe when there's ambiguity between genital_slit and cloaca we default to genital_slit.

crocogator said:
I believe when there's ambiguity between genital_slit and cloaca we default to genital_slit.

Do we? I’m not sure what to do regarding dragons since they’re not 'real', but normally we would assume the anatomically correct option. If the character was a lizard, we would assume cloaca; if the character was a dolphin, we would assume genital slit. I’d be more inclined to assume cloaca for a dragon since dragons are based on reptiles and have nothing to do with cetaceans.

spe said:
Do we? I’m not sure what to do regarding dragons since they’re not 'real', but normally we would assume the anatomically correct option. If the character was a lizard, we would assume cloaca; if the character was a dolphin, we would assume genital slit. I’d be more inclined to assume cloaca for a dragon since dragons are based on reptiles and have nothing to do with cetaceans.

I remember waaaaay back when I asked that question.

Cloaca would only be tagged if there isn't any anus present. If they (i.e., dragons) appear to have a slit and an anus, you default to genital_slit (if you can see their penis). Otherwise, ambiguous_slit is still an option.