The tag implication #66336 isabelle_(animal_crossing) -> shih_tzu has been rejected.

Reason: Reason: She is one and always has been one. I did a search for "isabelle_(animal_crossing) -canine", and I didn't notice any instances of species swap or cosplay that substantially removes canine elements, just subpar species tagging.

Note: You might see that I have posted this suggestion before, but a janitor notified me that I didn't use the proper method when submitting it. I have adjusted it accordingly.

EDIT: The tag implication isabelle_(animal_crossing) -> shih_tzu (forum #436630) has been rejected by @Cinder.

post #4644777

thegreatwolfgang said:
post #4644777

Fair enough, that's a good reason to have them post a doomed implication

sufficient_username said:
Reason: Reason: She is one and always has been one. I did a search for "isabelle_(animal_crossing) -canine", and I didn't notice any instances of species swap or cosplay that substantially removes canine elements, just subpar species tagging.

Check again.

Apart from alternate_species, character tags are also tagged on cosplay as you have said it yourself, see isabelle_(animal_crossing) cosplay -canine.

post #1657400

Note: You might see that I have posted this suggestion before, but a janitor notified me that I didn't use the proper method when submitting it. I have adjusted it accordingly.

And conveniently ignored all other objection to your request.

We do not accept character_tag -> species_tag implications in principle due to the existence of fanart that uses alternate_species or cosplay, regardless of actual number of cases in said character's tag.

thegreatwolfgang said:
And conveniently ignored all other objection to your request.

I'll never understand how someone can hear a well-worded refutation of their position from someone who's certainly more knowledgeable on the subject and just respond: "Nah, actually I'm right." literally incomprehensible.

The tag implication isabelle_(animal_crossing) -> shih_tzu (forum #436630) has been rejected by @Cinder.

dba_afish said:
I'll never understand how someone can hear a well-worded refutation of their position from someone who's certainly more knowledgeable on the subject and just respond: "Nah, actually I'm right." literally incomprehensible.

https://youtu.be/yWULCfJ2PGA