Topic: Tag Alias: aftermath -> after_sex

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Aliasing aftermath → after_sex
Link to alias

Reason:

I'm not sure how this differs, but it looks to be the same despite aftermath implying after_sex. I ran across it after seeing the "aftermath" of battle, so it may need to be unimplicated and disassembled instead.

Updated

I don't know whether this should even be aliased or not since aftermath isn't 100% sex.

Most people would think aftermath= war/battles = nukes, so aliasing it would be a bad idea since future tagging of the tag "aftermath"(4 battles) would immediately be switched to after_sex.

But looking at the low tag rate(specifically 4 battles), I'm not one to judge.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

Here's the old threads: forum #47403, forum #26056.

Suffice to say, it has been pending for a while. The only reason I haven't brought it up myself is because that old discussions got... a bit messy.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
Here's the old threads: forum #47403, forum #26056.

Suffice to say, it has been pending for a while. The only reason I haven't brought it up myself is because that old discussions got... a bit messy.

Wow that discussion was really disorganized. They seem to miss the point that TWYS covers for us.

  • Option 5: Disassemble the tag from sex images and ignore the others because it's vague And silly to tag anything here with aftermath but not enough to be considered invalid (unless it becomes a problem).

Updated by anonymous

Tagged out about half of them (the cooking timers and battles) and approved the alias.

Updated by anonymous