The bulk update request #9046 is pending approval.

remove implication taurification (462) -> taur (20574)
create implication taurified (536) -> taur (20574)
create implication taurified (536) -> alternate_form (4727)

Reason: Same propose, alignment with the past-tense terminology used for the other types of alt bodies such as anthrofied, Humanized, or feralized

forum #373336 > alias taurification to taurified

The bulk update request #9047 is pending approval.

create implication long_neck_taur (36) -> taur (20574)
create implication rear_taur (13) -> taur (20574)
create implication chocobo_taur (59) -> chocobo (1418)
create implication drider (198) -> humanoid_taur (6021)
create implication hand_taur (20) -> taur (20574)
create implication protogen_taur (2) -> protogen (10673)
create implication protogen_taur (2) -> taur (20574)
create implication salamander_taur (9) -> amphibian_taur (14)
create implication salamander_taur (9) -> salamander (6846)
create implication tardigrade_taur (24) -> tardigrade (62)
create implication tardigrade_taur (24) -> taur (20574)
create implication axolotl_taur (2) -> axolotl (3204)
create implication axolotl_taur (2) -> taur (20574)
create implication chimera_taur (12) -> chimera (10137)
create implication chimera_taur (12) -> taur (20574)
create implication mollusk_taur (10) -> mollusk (23763)
create implication mollusk_taur (10) -> taur (20574)

Reason: other bits and pieces..

topic #45439 Hextaurs
topic #43783 Unusual taur implications
topic #39118 Taur pregnancies (double pregnancies)

The bulk update request #9058 is pending approval.

create implication tiny_upper_body (8) -> small_upper_body (197)
create implication small_upper_body (197) -> taur (20574)

Reason: Taurs with smaller upper bodies

small > comparable to regular size difference post #4937367 post #3909505
tiny > comparable to micro and macro levels of size difference post #2024295 post #1853980

PS: They could probably use better names like 'disproportionate_taur' and 'macro-micro_taur' respectively for example but will leave as is for now, suggestions appreciated.

ryu_deacon said:
create implication small_upper_body (158) -> taur (17544)

I think small_upper_bodied_taur would be a better name for this. small_upper_body reads like it can apply to normal bipeds that have a small torso/chest and head with short arms, and larger long legs.

watsit said:
I think small_upper_bodied_taur would be a better name for this. small_upper_body reads like it can apply to normal bipeds that have a small torso/chest and head with short arms, and larger long legs.

Ya, I did consider that but was hoping there might be something shorter^^;

The bulk update request #9109 is pending approval.

create implication two_taur (22) -> taur (20574)
create implication two_taur (22) -> conjoined (2582)
create implication feral_taur (44) -> taur (20574)
create implication feral_taur (44) -> conjoined (2582)
create implication multi_taur (78) -> multi_body (133)
create implication long_taur (252) -> multi_leg (2221)
create alias taur_train (15) -> long_taur (252)

Reason: multi taur bits and pieces

two taur > individual upper bodies attached at both ends of the lower body.
feral taur > lower body is a complete fully formed living/thinking feral specimen, conjoined to an anthro/human/humanoid.

bumping this, still awaiting feedback on these.

bumping this again

Do the BURs in this thread happen to be invisible to users??

ryu_deacon said:
Do the BURs in this thread happen to be invisible to users??

No they’re all visible, why would they be invisible?

manitka said:
No they’re all visible, why would they be invisible?

No votes wether negative or positive and no feedback besides the one post by watsit. Some of these are no more complicated/debatable than a simple artist name change yet no votes or feedback. Which might suggest the posts are being hidden to certain users.

Personally I don't like species_taur; we don't do that with anthro or feral, and I don't really see the reason they're any more useful with taur or humanoid.

ryu_deacon said:
No votes wether negative or positive and no feedback besides the one post by watsit. Some of these are no more complicated/debatable than a simple artist name change yet no votes or feedback. Which might suggest the posts are being hidden to certain users.

I’ve seen this a few times but I don’t know enough about taurs to vote, honestly.

And in all honesty like scth said I’m not the biggest fan of all of the super specific species taurs, but I don’t want to vote based on my own preferences.

bumping this again, every prior <species>_taur implication does seem to get approved pretty much automatically by which ever mod happens to see them usually in under a year that they were submited so.