The bulk update request #8575 is pending approval.

Reason: Just trying to standardize this, for clothing that doesn't match on both sides.

Asymmetrical seems like a more versal term. Mismatched works for things that come in pairs, but breaks down for single items.
What's this clothing mismatched with?
post #1109538 post #3919262
Also not to be confused with one_*_on:
post #4586223

waydence said:
Asymmetrical seems like a more versal term. Mismatched works for things that come in pairs, but breaks down for single items.
What's this clothing mismatched with?
post #1109538 post #3919262
Also not to be confused with one_*_on:
post #4586223

I originally had it as asymmetrical_* and I'm not against swapping it, ahaha. I would agree it's the better name.

TBH I would imply one_* to ashmmetrical_* since fundamentally if you're only wearing one sock, your socks aren't matching on both sides. But there might be weird edge cases.

The bulk update request #8583 is pending approval.

create alias mismatched_clothing (21) -> asymmetrical_clothing (228)
create alias mismatched_footwear (23) -> asymmetrical_footwear (169)
create alias mismatched_legwear (48) -> asymmetrical_legwear (39)
create alias mismatched_handwear (2) -> asymmetrical_handwear (0)
create alias mismatched_gloves (14) -> asymmetrical_gloves (0)
create alias mismatched_armwear (6) -> asymmetrical_armwear (0)

Reason: Moving aliases to separate BUR because BUR too long, pointing to asymmetrical_* instead like my initial plan since it encompasses more.

Missed a couple of lines:

create implication asymmetrical_bottomwear (0) -> mismatched_clothing (9)
create implication asymmetrical_bottomwear (0) -> bottomwear (376437)
create implication asymmetrical_pants (8) -> mismatched_bottomwear (0)

is supposed to be

imply asymmetrical_bottomwear -> bottomwear
imply asymmetrical_bottomwear -> asymmetrical_clothing
imply asymmetrical_pants -> asymmetrical_bottomwear

(included middle line so it's easy to copy/pase)

waydence said:
Missed a couple of lines:

create implication asymmetrical_bottomwear (0) -> mismatched_clothing (9)
create implication asymmetrical_bottomwear (0) -> bottomwear (376437)
create implication asymmetrical_pants (8) -> mismatched_bottomwear (0)

is supposed to be

imply asymmetrical_bottomwear -> bottomwear
imply asymmetrical_bottomwear -> asymmetrical_clothing
imply asymmetrical_pants -> asymmetrical_bottomwear

(included middle line so it's easy to copy/pase)

Thank you

post #2778546