The bulk update request #7856 is active.

create implication black_dildo (420) -> dildo (89305)
create implication blue_dildo (696) -> dildo (89305)
create implication brown_dildo (33) -> dildo (89305)
create implication green_dildo (272) -> dildo (89305)
create implication grey_dildo (58) -> dildo (89305)
create implication orange_dildo (74) -> dildo (89305)
create implication pink_dildo (892) -> dildo (89305)
create implication purple_dildo (1051) -> dildo (89305)
create implication red_dildo (453) -> dildo (89305)
create implication tan_dildo (16) -> dildo (89305)
create implication white_dildo (39) -> dildo (89305)
create implication yellow_dildo (86) -> dildo (89305)

Reason: standard colour implication

EDIT: The bulk update request #7856 (forum #402999) has been approved by @slyroon.

gattonero2001 said:
The bulk update request #7856 is active.

create implication black_dildo (420) -> dildo (89305)
create implication blue_dildo (696) -> dildo (89305)
create implication brown_dildo (33) -> dildo (89305)
create implication green_dildo (272) -> dildo (89305)
create implication grey_dildo (58) -> dildo (89305)
create implication orange_dildo (74) -> dildo (89305)
create implication pink_dildo (892) -> dildo (89305)
create implication purple_dildo (1051) -> dildo (89305)
create implication red_dildo (453) -> dildo (89305)
create implication tan_dildo (16) -> dildo (89305)
create implication white_dildo (39) -> dildo (89305)
create implication yellow_dildo (86) -> dildo (89305)

Reason: standard colour implication

What about teal?
We should have [color]_sex_toy imply sex_toy too

The bulk update request #7858 has been rejected.

create implication teal_dildo (7) -> dildo (89305)
create implication teal_dildo (7) -> teal_sex_toy (0)
create implication black_sex_toy (1) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication blue_sex_toy (4) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication brown_sex_toy (1) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication green_sex_toy (3) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication grey_sex_toy (2) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication orange_sex_toy (4) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication pink_sex_toy (3) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication purple_sex_toy (11) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication red_sex_toy (3) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication tan_sex_toy (0) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication teal_sex_toy (0) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication white_sex_toy (0) -> sex_toy (149507)
create implication yellow_sex_toy (3) -> sex_toy (149507)

Reason: And the final e6 color + sex_toy colors

EDIT: The bulk update request #7858 (forum #403004) has been rejected by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #7856 (forum #402999) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #7858 (forum #403004) has been rejected by @slyroon.

auto_moderator said:
The bulk update request #7858 (forum #403004) has been rejected by @slyroon.

for why?

The bulk update request #7972 is active.

create alias black_sex_toy (1) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias blue_sex_toy (4) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias brown_sex_toy (1) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias green_sex_toy (3) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias grey_sex_toy (2) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias orange_sex_toy (4) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias pink_sex_toy (3) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias purple_sex_toy (11) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias red_sex_toy (3) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias tan_sex_toy (0) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias teal_sex_toy (0) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias white_sex_toy (0) -> sex_toy (149507)
create alias yellow_sex_toy (3) -> sex_toy (149507)

Reason: Slyroon said no to the color-specific sex toy tags (which makes sense, because they're kind of useless umbrella tags anyway... do we really need a tag for both red dildos and red fleshlights and red anal beads...?) so this BUR aims to alias them away.

EDIT: The bulk update request #7972 (forum #403956) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #7972 (forum #403956) has been approved by @slyroon.