The bulk update request #6572 is pending approval.

create implication nose_markings (68) -> facial_markings (57656)
create implication mouth_markings (36) -> facial_markings (57656)
create implication elbow_markings (35) -> arm_markings (9720)
create implication finger_markings (127) -> hand_markings (472)
create implication palm_markings (7) -> hand_markings (472)
create implication knee_markings (54) -> leg_markings (60577)
create implication toe_markings (63) -> foot_markings (387)
create implication inner_ear_markings (17) -> ear_markings (51095)

Reason: Part 1, marking locations that are missing implications.

The bulk update request #6573 is pending approval.

Reason: And part 2, the ones that should also imply the body part

The bulk update request #6574 is pending approval.

create alias pubic_markings (46) -> crotch_markings (62)
create alias nose_marking (11) -> nose_markings (68)
create alias tongue_marking (0) -> tongue_markings (10)
create alias facials_markings (4) -> facial_markings (57656)
create alias toe_(marking) (0) -> toe_markings (63)
create alias finger_(marking) (0) -> finger_markings (127)

Reason: Also, couple aliases

dsco said:
The bulk update request #6574 is pending approval.

create alias pubic_markings (46) -> crotch_markings (62)
create alias nose_marking (11) -> nose_markings (68)
create alias tongue_marking (0) -> tongue_markings (10)
create alias facials_markings (4) -> facial_markings (57656)
create alias toe_(marking) (0) -> toe_markings (63)
create alias finger_(marking) (0) -> finger_markings (127)

Reason: Also, couple aliases

Uhm, isn't it possible to have pubic markings not at the crotch? Like, right below the belly button but not below the pubic bone?
Isn't a toe_(marking) a toe-shaped marking and toe_markings when you have markings ON a toe? Yeah, this is probably why you made this alias. The first one makes no sense but I'll have to check if that is how it was actually used. It seems that toe_(marking) was actually toeless_(marking) like the same place as toeless socks but a marking. There are no remaining examples to alias.

Ah, I looked it up because I was sort of sure. Crotch means between the legs and including the genitals/groin. Supposedly named for the intersection of two rivers. Pubic mound is ABOVE, right?

While looking at pubic_markings, I saw post #4134059 which seems like it's not actually the pubes, but like a womb tattoo. Belly marking since it's at the navel? Given the artist, this actually makes some sense.

Already replaced tongue_marking with tongue_markings to be consistent with the other markings tags.

All results for facials_markings look to be mouths with unusual placement. i.e. on the belly
Unusual_mouth_placement is probably the intended tag by the uploader? Left the uploader a PM with link to here.
This is the only alias that is questionable in BUR 6574. See also: topic #37594