Topic: BUR for <color>_bikini_bottom Implications Pt.1

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

IchHabs

Member

The bulk update request #6056 is pending approval.

create implication black_bikini_bottom (365) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication blue_bikini_bottom (172) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication brown_bikini_bottom (0) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication green_bikini_bottom (126) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication grey_bikini_bottom (4) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication orange_bikini_bottom (45) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication pink_bikini_bottom (142) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication purple_bikini_bottom (130) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication red_bikini_bottom (172) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication tan_bikini_bottom (4) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication teal_bikini_bottom (4) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication white_bikini_bottom (99) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication yellow_bikini_bottom (89) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication rainbow_bikini_bottom (0) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication translucent_bikini_bottom (5) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication multicolored_bikini_bottom (7) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication two_tone_bikini_bottom (7) -> bikini_bottom (9380)
create implication multi_tone_bikini_bottom (0) -> bikini_bottom (9380)

Reason: Extension of BUR #6055, exclusively dealing with "<color>_bikini_bottom -> bikini_bottom".
I hope it's obvious why these implications should exist.

Watsit

Privileged

ichhabs said:
create implication monotone_bikini_bottom (1) -> bikini_bottom (6813)

Seems pointless, since the vast majority of bikini bottoms will be monotone, making the results little different from bikini_bottom itself if the tag were even well-used. This should be an alias instead.

IchHabs

Member

watsit said:
Seems pointless, since the vast majority of bikini bottoms will be monotone, making the results little different from bikini_bottom itself if the tag were even well-used. This should be an alias instead.

You could say that about most monotone_xyz tags. And one can always just search for -multicolored_xyz. Your argument implies that monotone clothing shouldn't be tagged to begin with.

Watsit

Privileged

ichhabs said:
You could say that about most monotone_xyz tags. And one can always just search for -multicolored_xyz.

Yeah, there's pending BURs to get rid of a number of them that have been found. It'll be harder to alias away if they have associated implications though, so it's best to alias away such tags when they're found rather than adding implications that will just have to be removed (or if they get aliased away first, having a BUR fail for trying to add implications to a tag that's aliased away).