The tag implication #52698 dress_shirt -> formal_wear has been rejected.

Reason: Dress shirts can be considered formal wear in most cases

EDIT: The tag implication dress_shirt -> formal_wear (forum #381164) has been rejected by @slyroon.

dress shirts are often worn casually or semi-casually

"in most cases" isn't enough, for an implication it must be in all cases.

Is there a case where a dress shirt wouldn't be considered formal wear? Wouldn't it still be formal wear even if worn casually? Pants are still bottomwear even if worn on the head or not being worn at all.

watsit said:
Is there a case where a dress shirt wouldn't be considered formal wear? Wouldn't it still be formal wear even if worn casually? Pants are still bottomwear even if worn on the head or not being worn at all.

the fashion-type tags like formal_wear are seemingly about entire outfits. so it seems more that it's about how the clothes are worn, rather than the clothes themselves. by that, I'm also unsure if such tags would apply to unworn clothes.

The tag implication dress_shirt -> formal_wear (forum #381164) has been rejected by @slyroon.