The tag implication #52127 hypnosis_sex -> hypnosis has been rejected.

Reason: Not sure why this implication doesn't exist already to be honest. It seems clear enough that hypnosis_sex cannot occur without hypnosis being involved.

EDIT: The tag implication hypnosis_sex -> hypnosis (forum #380235) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

I know there are lots of compound tags that are useful and kept but - this kinda sounds a lot like hypnosis sex

cloudpie said:
I know there are lots of compound tags that are useful and kept but - this kinda sounds a lot like hypnosis sex

I can agree with that. I just know the hypnosis_sex tag is used and wasn't sure how best to address it. The compound tag is definitely rare, so clearing it away might be smarter. I'm not sure how that's done though, this was my first suggested implication and I'm still learning the whole system.

The tag implication hypnosis_sex -> hypnosis (forum #380235) has been rejected by @scaliespe.