The tag implication #51587 dark_glans -> glans has been rejected.
Reason: Self-explanatory.
EDIT: The tag implication dark_glans -> glans (forum #375141) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: dark_glans -> glans
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Should be an alias, IMO. The dark_<noun> tags are too vague and subjective.
The tag implication dark_glans -> glans (forum #375141) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.