Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
I was thinking it'd be a great idea to have a meta tag for classics of the furry Fandom, standard would be if it's 10+ years old and is considered an iconic classic.
Tag could be Fandom_classic, Furry_Classic, or just Classic.
Examples off the top of my head would be:
post #991917 post #2036736 post #8933 post #2958961 post #13544 post #547411 post #1613668
Please give further examples and share your thoughts on this idea for a meta tag
Updated
There's already a year tag group.
Optionally, since years aren't always tagged, use these:
alphamule said:
There's already a year tag group.Optionally, since years aren't always tagged, use these:
I know that, but that's not what I'm suggesting here
smuglytherat said:
I was thinking it'd be a great idea to have a meta tag for classics of the furry Fandom, standard would be if it's 10+ years old and is considered an iconic classic.Tag could be Fandom_classic, Furry_Classic, or just Classic.
Examples off the top of my head would be:
post #991917 post #2036736 post #8933 post #2958961 post #13544 post #547411 post #1613668
Please give further examples and share your thoughts on this idea for a meta tag
This might be better off as a set if you want to make one, since everyone's going to have different feelings about what's "iconic" and nostalgic to them personally
cloudpie said:
This might be better off as a set if you want to make one, since everyone's going to have different feelings about what's "iconic" and nostalgic to them personally
Potentially
I mean, if you really want the most iconic posts, there's always order:score_asc.
...although the real most iconic post is gone now.
sipothac said:
I mean, if you really want the most iconic posts, there's always order:score_asc....although the real most iconic post is gone now.
And most infamous! Still got 6911, though. You're probably better off not looking that up.
Updated
Any objectively defined tag would have to substantiate a claim to be an "iconic classic", preferably by quoting multiple later works that directly reference it. By my count, only two of your examples meet that criterion, and the rest are just comics or animations you found funny.
Also it wouldn't contain Ashchu or cheese grater so what's even the point
wat8548 said:
Any objectively defined tag would have to substantiate a claim to be an "iconic classic", preferably by quoting multiple later works that directly reference it. By my count, only two of your examples meet that criterion, and the rest are just comics or animations you found funny.
Also it wouldn't contain Ashchu or cheese grater so what's even the point
The examples I chose were images and animations that were popular back when I was entering the Fandom in the early 2010's
