Topic: slit_play BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #5216 is pending approval.

create implication slit_penetration (2462) -> slit_play (3286) # duplicate of implication #11941
create implication slit_fingering (382) -> slit_play (3286) # duplicate of implication #29758
create implication slit_vore (27) -> slit_play (3286)
create implication slit_tribadism (9) -> slit_play (3286)
create implication mutual_slit_penetration (38) -> slit_penetration (2462)
create implication mutual_slit_penetration (38) -> mutual_penetration (1117)
create implication double_slit_penetration (22) -> slit_penetration (2462)
create implication double_slit_penetration (22) -> double_penetration (35257)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (83) -> tentacle_penetration (17407)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (83) -> slit_penetration (2462)
create implication penis_in_slit (501) -> slit_penetration (2462) # duplicate of implication #50523
create implication tail_in_slit (31) -> slit_penetration (2462)
create implication tail_in_slit (31) -> tail_play (11186)

Reason: this should make it a lot easier to find the various types of activities involving genital slits. I've left out slit_licking, oral_slit_play, tongue_in_slit, and frottage_in_slit because I'm not really sure what should be done with those.

Hmm, 3 of those are duplicates of existing implication requests... and those 3 should probably get approved, but sooooo long of backlog. Also, these all look reasonable.

I wasn't sure if I should leave out the duplicate suggestions especially since half of these implications kinda rely on slit_penetration implying slit_play, and that suggestion has been pending for 5 years now, and I'm not really sure what i should do when that happens.