Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #50461 nude_edit -> nude has been rejected.
Reason: I don't see a case where this implication would not make sense.
EDIT: The tag implication nude_edit -> nude (forum #361982) has been rejected by @andoefa.
Updated by auto moderator
andoefa said:
Reason: I don't see a case where this implication would not make sense.
Edits may have just removed the articles of clothing from the desired places, but not every article of clothing.
Does not work for partially_clothed or mostly_nude characters.
thegreatwolfgang said:
Edits may have just removed the articles of clothing from the desired places, but not every article of clothing.
Does not work for partially_clothed or mostly_nude characters.
I see. I made the false assumption that nude_edit was limited to nude characters and should have checked. Thanks for the examples.
The tag implication nude_edit -> nude (forum #361982) has been rejected by @andoefa.
