The tag implication #49177 cherub -> angel has been approved.

Reason: Cherubim are a kind of angel.

EDIT: The tag implication cherub -> angel (forum #354631) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Just to know that the cherubim in the Bible are not portrayed as winged babies, but terrifyingly awesome heavenly beings consisting of four wings and four heads of a human, a lion, a bull, and an eagle.

There's also biblically_accurate_angel, so should we use angel for both types of angels, and have separate tags for the "modern" depiction of an angel / biblical depiction of cherub? So, "modern"_angel + biblically_accurate_angel and cherub + biblically_accurate_cherub?

alexyorim said:
Just to know that the cherubim in the Bible are not portrayed as winged babies...

True enough. Those are putti (singular: putto).

alexyorim said:
Just to know that the cherubim in the Bible are not portrayed as winged babies, but terrifyingly awesome heavenly beings consisting of four wings and four heads of a human, a lion, a bull, and an eagle.

Oh yeah, I know about that. I just figure I should only try to address so many things at a time.

The tag implication cherub -> angel (forum #354631) has been approved by @gattonero2001.