The tag implication #49054 facesitting -> sitting_on_another has been approved.

Reason: You can't facesit without sittin' on someone.

EDIT: The tag implication facesitting -> sitting_on_another (forum #353947) has been approved by @Millcore.

The tag implication facesitting -> sitting_on_another (forum #353947) has been approved by @Millcore.

I think this is quite problematic. If sitting_on_another doesn't require the sitting character to be entirely or almost entirely supported by the sat-on character, wouldn't cowgirl_position, reverse_cowgirl_position, chair_position, mastery_position, reverse_missionary_position, etc., also implicate sitting_on_another?

a_yak said:
I think this is quite problematic. If sitting_on_another doesn't require the sitting character to be entirely or almost entirely supported by the sat-on character, wouldn't cowgirl_position, reverse_cowgirl_position, chair_position, mastery_position, reverse_missionary_position, etc., also implicate sitting_on_another?

Can't think why not, except for that last one where they're lying down instead. The names of most of them explicitly refer to sitting.

wat8548 said:
Can't think why not, except for that last one where they're lying down instead. The names of most of them explicitly refer to sitting.

Widening the scope of the tag that far would immensely water it down. Wouldn't you agree that someone searching sitting_on_another isn't looking for cowgirl_position?