The bulk update request #3849 has been rejected.

Reason: BUR for tags with males and females peeing on others. This was quickly put together, so let me know of any typos or missing combinations.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3849 (forum #353681) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

leotheairwolf said:
The bulk update request #3849 has been rejected.

create implication male_peeing_on_male (155) -> male_peeing (3352)
create implication male_peeing_on_male (155) -> male_peed_on (276)
create implication male_peeing_on_female (50) -> male_peeing (3352)
create implication male_peeing_on_female (50) -> female_peed_on (152)
create implication male_peeing_on_andromorph (0) -> male_peeing (3352)
create implication male_peeing_on_andromorph (0) -> andromorph_peed_on (5)
create implication male_peeing_on_andromorph (0) -> male_peeing_on_intersex (1)
create implication male_peeing_on_gynomorph (0) -> male_peeing (3352)
create implication male_peeing_on_gynomorph (0) -> gynomorph_peed_on (4)
create implication male_peeing_on_gynomorph (0) -> male_peeing_on_intersex (1)
create implication female_peeing_on_female (28) -> female_peeing (2604)
create implication female_peeing_on_female (28) -> female_peed_on (152)
create implication female_peeing_on_male (43) -> female_peeing (2604)
create implication female_peeing_on_male (43) -> male_peed_on (276)
create implication female_peeing_on_andromorph (0) -> female_peeing (2604)
create implication female_peeing_on_andromorph (0) -> andromorph_peed_on (5)
create implication female_peeing_on_andromorph (0) -> female_peeing_on_intersex (0)
create implication female_peeing_on_gynomorph (1) -> female_peeing (2604)
create implication female_peeing_on_gynomorph (1) -> gynomorph_peed_on (4)
create implication female_peeing_on_gynomorph (1) -> female_peeing_on_intersex (0)

Reason: BUR for tags with males and females peeing on others. This was quickly put together, so let me know of any typos or missing combinations.

Instead of three separate threads, these BURs should've been all on one thread to consolidate discussion. Additionally, there is also discussion in topic #36598 about these very tags.

trevortheyeen said:
Instead of three separate threads, these BURs should've been all on one thread to consolidate discussion. Additionally, there is also discussion in topic #36598 about these very tags.

There is a limit of 25 implications/aliases per BUR. If I could have had this all be one BUR, I would have had them all be one BUR.

leotheairwolf said:
There is a limit of 25 implications/aliases per BUR. If I could have had this all be one BUR, I would have had them all be one BUR.

You can create multiple BURs in one thread. For example, if you wanted to create another BUR in this thread, you would put "36669" (the forum topic number) in the "forum topic" field when creating the BUR.

crocogator said:
You can create multiple BURs in one thread. For example, if you wanted to create another BUR in this thread, you would put "36669" (the forum topic number) in the "forum topic" field when creating the BUR.

Ah! Thanks for the tip croc. I'll have to remember that in the future then.

The bulk update request #3849 (forum #353681) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Rejection reason is at topic #36869. In summary, to mitigate combinatorial explosion, the mods will be taking a different approach.