Topic: [REJECTED] Tag alias: brokenmojo -> greasymojo

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

bitWolfy

Former Staff

philosophicalmind said:
The tag alias #60439 brokenmojo -> greasymojo has been rejected.

Reason: brokenmojo is the same artist as greasymojo. The greasymojo moniker has a greater presence on E621 and is used in both the artist's FurAffinity and Twitter.

Do you have any actual proof to share?
Simply stating that "A is the same as B" is not enough.

As far as I can tell, there is nothing connecting these accounts.
They have entirely separate social media that don't link to each other, to the point of having separate Patreons.
Either these are two different people, or the artist is trying to keep the two names separate.

I think they are names of the same artist, but also they're going to some lengths to stay separate. I don't find many links, but there are a few. If you take a close look at BrokenMojo's signature (eg.) versus GreasyMojo's, (eg.) you'll see they sign the "Mojo" part of their names in exactly the same way. While it's unlikely two different artists would share the exact same partial signature, it's inadequate for our purposes. Several of BrokenMojo's pictures were retweeted by GreasyMojo, but that's hardly diagnostic of anything.

Unless some better evidence comes to light, I think this one should be rejected.

bitwolfy said:
Do you have any actual proof to share?
Simply stating that "A is the same as B" is not enough.

As far as I can tell, there is nothing connecting these accounts.
They have entirely separate social media that don't link to each other, to the point of having separate Patreons.
Either these are two different people, or the artist is trying to keep the two names separate.

It is the latter. Just for posterity and to show I wasn't just whistling Dixie, the artist stated that both accounts were theirs in these post: [1], [2]

Updated