The tag implication #47202 underwear_down -> bottomwear_down has been rejected.

Reason: Underwear is a subset of bottom wear, so it should implicate the broader tag.

EDIT: The tag implication underwear_down -> bottomwear_down (forum #347179) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Underwear isn't always bottomwear, such as a bra.

faucet said:
Underwear isn't always bottomwear, such as a bra.

yeah, but from what I'm seeing of this tag it's exclusively briefs/panties/whatever. also bra_down already exists and is for a totally diffrent situation.

also, for some reason, we don't have a separation between underpants and other undergarments which seems like it'd probably cause problems.

The tag implication underwear_down -> bottomwear_down (forum #347179) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.