The tag implication #47173 incest_(lore) -> family has been rejected.

Reason: Incest literally means sex with a family member, so the tag incest_(lore) should be implied with the tag family!

EDIT: The tag implication incest_(lore) -> family (forum #346672) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

General tags are for things you can see, lore is for things you can't. I don't see how a lore tag could logically imply any non-lore tag.

lafcadio said:
General tags are for things you can see, lore is for things you can't. I don't see how a lore tag could logically imply any non-lore tag.

Ok, ok. Point taken. But at least have the tag siblings imply the tag family...

cow_of_fire said:
Ok, ok. Point taken. But at least have the tag siblings imply the tag family...

the wiki page says

A group of relatives.

so that'd mean more than two. I'd say that it'd be meant to tag when a post contains the entire family unit, not just when a post contains any related characters.

The tag implication incest_(lore) -> family (forum #346672) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.