The bulk update request #2906 is pending approval.

create alias great_izuchi (99) -> izuchi (33)
create implication izuchi (33) -> bird_wyvern (1487)
create implication aknosom (21) -> bird_wyvern (1487)
create implication tetranadon (16) -> amphibian_(mh) (113)
create implication bishaten (8) -> primatius (482)
create implication somnacanth (49) -> leviathan_(mh) (1574)
create implication magnamalo (90) -> fanged_wyvern (2494)
create implication goss_harag (86) -> primatius (482)
create implication almudron (64) -> leviathan_(mh) (1574)
remove alias temnoceran (43) -> nerscylla (16)

Reason: Implying all MH Rise monsters part 1
The other greats and dromes are aliased, izucchi should be no different
Temnocerans aren't just nerscylla anymore.
Part 2 incoming due to limit.

The bulk update request #2907 is pending approval.

create implication ibushi_(elder_dragon) (9) -> elder_dragon (3234)
create implication narwa_(elder_dragon) (17) -> elder_dragon (3234)
create implication garangolm (6) -> primatius (482)
create implication lunagaron (129) -> fanged_wyvern (2494)
create implication gaismagorm (8) -> elder_dragon (3234)

Reason: Implying all MH Rise monsters part 2
Adding gaismagorm for future proofing.

benjiboyo said:

create implication izuchi -> monster_hunter
create implication aknosom -> monster_hunter
create implication tetranadon -> monster_hunter
create implication bishaten -> monster_hunter
create implication somnacanth -> monster_hunter
create implication magnamalo -> monster_hunter
create implication goss_harag -> monster_hunter
create implication almudron -> monster_hunter
create implication ibushi_(elder_dragon) -> monster_hunter
create implication narwa_(elder_dragon) -> monster_hunter
create implication garangolm -> monster_hunter
create implication lunagaron -> monster_hunter
create implication malzeno -> monster_hunter
create implication gaismagorm -> monster_hunter

Redundant as bird_wyvern, amphibian_(mh), primatius, leviathan_(mh), fanged_wyvern and elder_dragon already imply monster_hunter.
create implication malzeno -> elder_dragon is missing as well.

waydence said:
Redundant as bird_wyvern, amphibian_(mh), primatius, leviathan_(mh), fanged_wyvern and elder_dragon already imply monster_hunter.
create implication malzeno -> elder_dragon is missing as well.

The malzeno imply elder dragon is apparently already done. Is redundancy that much of a problem?

benjiboyo said:
The malzeno imply elder dragon is apparently already done. Is redundancy that much of a problem?

Redundancy is best avoided. If tag A already implies tag B which implies tag C, there’s no reason for tag A to also imply tag C, as it already receives the same implication through B.

benjiboyo said:
The malzeno imply elder dragon is apparently already done.

It's pending, see topic #34575.

scaliespe said:
Redundancy is best avoided. If tag A already implies tag B which implies tag C, there’s no reason for tag A to also imply tag C, as it already receives the same implication through B.

Allright, i'll remove it, and if i did i probably could've fit the entire thing in 1 bur actually.

waydence said:
It's pending, see topic #34575.

Should that get rejected and I add it to MY BUR?

The bulk update request #11380 is active.

create implication bombadgy (2) -> primatius (482)
create implication rachnoid (1) -> temnoceran (43)
create implication pyrantula (0) -> temnoceran (43)
create implication boggi (1) -> bird_wyvern (1487)
create implication gowngoat (4) -> herbivore_(mh) (150)

Reason: Small monster implications missing

Also narwa (elder dragon) and ibushi (elder dragon) should probably be aliased to have (mh) suffixes instead, like most MH-specific tags do, no?

EDIT: The bulk update request #11380 (forum #454265) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #11380 (forum #454265) has been approved by @spe.

And uh... could we get the other ones approved as well? I CAN duplicate them if that's necessary, I guess?