The tag implication #45383 cum_in_partner's_clothing -> cum_in_clothing has been rejected.

Reason: clothing is clothing, regardless of whom it belongs to

EDIT: The tag implication cum_in_partner's_clothing -> cum_in_clothing (forum #339548) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.

I considered this for the megaBUR but rejected it on the basis that it would dilute the meaning of cum_in_clothing to an unacceptable degree. They are fundamentally different acts which are barely related to each other. You might as well suggest peeing_on_another be implicated to wetting.

The wiki for cum_in_clothing currently indicates cumming inside one's own worn clothing. cum_in_partner's_clothing involves cumming inside of another character's worn clothing.

Perhaps the tag cum_in_own_clothing should be created to better describe cumming in one's own clothing and allowing cum_in_clothing to describe cumming in any character's clothing. Similar tags already exist like cum_in_own_mouth.

This would then allow for the following implications:

• cum_in_clothing
• cum_in_own_clothing
• cum_in_partner's_clothing

Looking into this more, the wikis for the tags cum_through_clothing, cum_in_underwear, and cum_through_underwear also indicate cumming in one's own clothing, despite the tags lacking the word own.

These tags should also get a cum_*_own_* version.

The tag implication cum_in_partner's_clothing -> cum_in_clothing (forum #339548) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.