Topic: should the tag "funky" be aliased to disambiguation or invalid?

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

so while watching a sexy garfield amvi saw the character tag funky (probably because it uses this Sashko Naganuma remix ) and it only has 4 posts to it's name as of writing. in fact here are all of them:
post #3411499 post #3137473 post #2779333 post #2742017

they all have very little in common and this tag doesn't seem to be used very much so i elect we get rid of it, although i can't decide weather to alias it to funky_(disambiguation) or to just invalid. so i'm here to ask what do y'all think?

I'd say move it to the invalid catagory. The way it is being used is too subjective to be useful as a search term, and the one time it could conceivably be referring a character, the character in question isn't unique or notable enough to get their own character tag, and I say "conceivably" because I can't tell for sure which character it is supposed to be referring to, or even if it is referring to a character at all. In the last image, "funky" isn't the name of the character; gokong is.

The more objective use of "funky" is already covered by body odor.

+1 for invalid, there's no clear application of it, it's just an adjective, as a tag it isn't intuitive (what is supposed to be funky within the scene? Is the character smelly? Are they listening to "funky" music? Does "funky" music play?), and clearly any application would be either subjective or redundant.

lonelylupine said:
You set it as an alias instead of making a BUR to move it to the invalid category. The site is phasing out the use of invalid tag.

Not technically true; it’s remaining in use for certain tags, but many are being moved to invalid category.