The tag implication #44337 kneeling_oral_position -> kneeling is pending approval.

Reason: A character can’t be in a kneeling oral position without them kneeling.

Makes sense but needs a bit of cleanup before approval

Has anyone done that?

Well, a lot of the results under the tag look like this.

You can’t really tell if the character is kneeling or not, but it _looks_ like the position. So either we remove a lot of these under the assertion that kneeling_oral_position must be visibly kneeling, and therefore these don’t qualify, or we keep it as-is, making this implication invalid.

I think I prefer the first option, but that definitely requires some cleanup.

I also don’t remember voting on this 9 months ago, but I guess I did.

I don't really see the point in separating images like post #3890717, post #5402618, post #5374170 out from this tag, I think people searching for this position probably aren't specifically looking for literal kneeling but rather a character knelt/crouched/sitting down, facing another standing (or sitting up higher whatever) character's genitals at eye level to give oral. Maybe we can come up with a name that doesn't involve the word kneeling if that's an issue? and the wiki page would need an edit