The bulk update request #2548 is pending approval.
create implication imminent_horn_sex (1) -> imminent_sex (41726)
create implication imminent_rough_sex (4) -> imminent_sex (41726)
create implication imminent_tribadism (44) -> imminent_sex (41726)
create implication imminent_underwater_sex (0) -> imminent_sex (41726)
create implication imminent_tribadism (44) -> imminent_vaginal (463)
create implication imminent_spitroast (82) -> imminent_oral (2937)
create implication imminent_anal_fingering (0) -> imminent_anal (5048)
create implication imminent_anal_fingering (0) -> imminent_fingering (41)
create implication imminent_reverse_gangbang (12) -> imminent_gangbang (826)
create implication imminent_tentacle_spitroast (2) -> imminent_spitroast (82)
create implication imminent_tentacle_spitroast (2) -> imminent_tentacle_sex (289)
create implication imminent_tentacle_rape (503) -> imminent_tentacle_sex (289)
create alias imminent_paizuri (0) -> imminent_titfuck (49)
change category imminent_breeding (0) -> invalid
remove alias imminent_penetration (0) -> imminent_sex (41726)
Reason: These first four imminent acts constitute imminent sex acts with 2 or more participants and, therefore, the imminent_sex tag. All of their non-imminent counterparts implicate sex.
The only counterargument I can think of is if sex is already ongoing and the character(s) are about to switch acts then the "sex" is no longer imminent, but about 1/5 of the imminent_sex posts are tagged sex and several of the subjects on the first page of imminent_sex sex are already engaged in sex acts. The other implications, aliases, and invalidation are descriptively self-evident and reflect the classification of the non imminent versions of the tags.