The tag implication #44066 spread_anus_butt -> spread_butt has been rejected.

Reason: Most, if not all (some species or characters do not have butts), images tagged with "spread_anus" consequentially feature a spread butt.
If an image is tagged with "spread_anus" and "butt", it should therefore also be tagged with "spread_butt".
I know that art might allow for bizarre body configurations like a displaced anus, but I don't think there's any art on this site with a butt and a spread anus where the butt is also not spread.

This is my first post on this forum, so please forgive me if it isn't possible for a tag implication to have two predicates.

EDIT: The tag implication spread_anus_butt -> spread_butt (forum #332362) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

That's not how implications work.
You cannot set it up to have a tag added when the post has two other tags.

The tag implication spread_anus_butt -> spread_butt (forum #332362) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

bitwolfy said:
You cannot set it up to have a tag added when the post has two other tags.

I see; is it possible to request a mass tag edit in the forums?

eristalis_interrupta said:
I see; is it possible to request a mass tag edit in the forums?

Only admins have the power to mass tag edit.

I don't think there's any art on this site with a butt and a spread anus where the butt is also not spread.

Except for when it is shown on two separate frames (i.e., unspread_butt on 1 frame, and a spread_anus on a closeup/cutaway shot) or is on another character (i.e., butt seen on character A as they are spreading anus of character B, which whom does not have a butt).

post #3006830 post #2052863 post #2763411