Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: titfuck -> penetration

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The tag implication #44044 titfuck -> penetration has been rejected.

Reason: I've been seeing a lot of posts with titfuck also having the penetration tag, despite no other forms of penetration.
I would like to put forward the suggestions of either creating an implication if it is a form of penetration, or making the titfuck wiki a bit more clear that it is not a form of penetration on it's own.

Whatever action is necessary could also apply to pecjob by the above reasoning.

EDIT: The tag implication titfuck -> penetration (forum #332218) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

applephrans said:
Sounds like those posts just need to have their tags cleaned up a bit

Agreed, so I'm wondering if maybe the wiki should be changed up just to mitigate the error?

lafcadio said:
I'm not convinced editing the wiki will change much. The penetration wiki itself is exceptionally clear, and if anything, this should probably be implying outercourse.

I understand that, I think it would just be helpful for those who do read the wiki. That suggestion of implying outercourse does sound very appropriate as well though.

applephrans said:
Outercourse is just non-penetrative sex, so based on the tags that imply sex, examples would include frottage, tribadism, cloacal_kiss, pecjob, pussyjob, handjob, footjob, titfuck, thigh_sex

Hot_dogging doesn't imply sex but it could be outercourse too

Those also sound like they could make for great implications, as long as it's not a problem to overpopulate this underutilized outercourse tag.