Topic: Tag implication: yellow_toad -> toad_(mario)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

What's the problem with the (color)_toad tags implicating toad_(mario)? (other than the fact it should've been made as a BUR)

They're not actual named characters like Toadette or Toadsworth, just a subset of the toad species. These should be moved to the species category instead then the implication should be fine.

faucet said:
What's the problem with the (color)_toad tags implicating toad_(mario)? (other than the fact it should've been made as a BUR)

They're not actual named characters like Toadette or Toadsworth, just a subset of the toad species. These should be moved to the species category instead then the implication should be fine.

post #1362965
Alternate species. They're still recognizable as originating from the Toad species, but aren't currently it, so they can get the color_toad tag but not the toad_(species) tag.

furrin_gok said:
post #1362965
Alternate species. They're still recognizable as originating from the Toad species, but aren't currently it, so they can get the color_toad tag but not the toad_(species) tag.

Are they actually characters, though, or just alternate colors of the species? If there can be more than one blue toad, I don’t think it can be a character and thus can’t be alternate species. It would probably have to be treated the same as shiny Pokémon which is also a species tag, and your cat_toad example would be like a subspecies of toad, or maybe a hybrid.