The bulk update request #2190 has been rejected.

remove implication egg_in_ass (1146) -> egg_insertion (4117)
remove implication egg_in_mouth (288) -> egg_insertion (4117)
remove implication egg_in_pussy (0) -> egg_insertion (4117)
remove implication egg_in_slit (13) -> egg_insertion (4117)
remove implication egg_in_cloaca (0) -> egg_insertion (4117)
remove implication egg_in_urethra (163) -> egg_insertion (4117)
remove implication egg_in_nipples (42) -> egg_insertion (4117)
remove implication egg_from_ass (828) -> oviposition (12716)
remove implication egg_from_mouth (69) -> oviposition (12716)
remove implication egg_from_pussy (0) -> oviposition (12716)
remove implication egg_from_cloaca (144) -> oviposition (12716)
remove implication egg_from_urethra (161) -> oviposition (12716)
remove implication egg_from_ovipositor (303) -> oviposition (12716)
remove implication egg_from_nipples (43) -> oviposition (12716)

Reason: Disclaimer: BUR #57 was also filed by me.

(mirroring cum_from_*) is way too aggressive an implication considering the pattern mirrors cum_from_* which doesn't have that sort of meaning. *_egg_insertion is a better fit for that implication.

turns out to have issues with regards to the implied tags not correctly representing what's on the image, with the most glaring of these is egg_from_mouth implying oviposition (even though most of these are actually egg_through). Likewise, eggs that were previously manually inserted incorrectly count as oviposition when coming out.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2190 (forum #330029) has failed: Implication for egg_in_ass not found

EDIT: The bulk update request #2190 (forum #330029) has been rejected by @spe.

Should be standardised, no? Like with cum_in_* and cum_from_*, the former is meant to convey "going in/inside" while the latter is meant to convey "coming out/leaking".

thegreatwolfgang said:
Should be standardised, no? Like with cum_in_* and cum_from_*, the former is meant to convey "going in/inside" while the latter is meant to convey "coming out/leaking".

isn't even mutually exclusive to cum_from_* (you oftentimes see both used together) and even if they were, cum_from_* doesn't imply emitting_cum because there are other ways to get cum coming out of someone's, say, mouth, and I would argue that, for the same reason, there's a leap in logic between egg_from_* and oviposition.

I should also mention how, at the time of topic #23840, it was unclear what would work best to represent direction, since the naming conventions were all over the place. We now have very clear and well established for ADJECTIVAL_oviposition AND ADJECTIVAL_egg_insertion. The mistake I made with bur 57 was assuming that an egg coming out of any hole could be counted as oviposition, but that's skipping a step between "an egg is coming out" and "the egg is being laid", which causes a number of issues with tags like egg_play and egg_through. Removing these implications creating new ones for the oviposition and egg_insertion patterns seems like a far better way to organize the tags to be, while avoiding surprise implications that might turn out to be incorrect.

EDIT: "egg_in_mouth" is also kind of being split between swallowing_eggs and oral_egg_insertion, to make the intent clearer.

The bulk update request #2190 (forum #330029) has been rejected by @spe.