Is there a different tag used instead? It exists for other acts.

If you checked the tag alias history, most of the implied_* have been aliased away to invalid_tag.
The common reason being "We don't do implied tags, especially if they're basically just the same as another tag currently happening."

If I were to interpret that for implied_sex, it can mean many other tags such as ambiguous_penetration/obscured_penetration, offscreen_sex/obscured_sex, etc.

There was a sort of funny Nick/Judy pic recently that would otherwise be rated questionable or explicit if that tag was valid? I assume this is one of the rare things were we could mandate at least questionable rating, and not explicit, if it was a valid tag, right?

Stated example, they're under covers but in doggy-style position if I remember right... Have to go find it.

Hmm, not post #1015141 but wonder if this counts as explicit groping. I guess it's only implied.

Ah, here it is: post #2412541 I guess it is explicit.

Its considered non descriptive iirc

alphamule said:
Hmm, not post #1015141 but wonder if this counts as explicit groping. I guess it's only implied.

It would not, the only valid tag here would be hand_in_underwear.
You don't know if her hand is just laying there, grabbing, fondling, or groping, so it's best left untagged.
Unless circumstances are made very obvious, you can include the subsequent tags (e.g., erection_under_clothing handjob or hand_in_underwear masturbation).

Ah, here it is: post #2412541 I guess it is explicit.

This should be tagged offscreen_sex (or obscured_sex when their entire body is in frame) and under_covers_sex. May be paired with suggestive when applicable.

thegreatwolfgang said:
It would not, the only valid tag here would be hand_in_underwear.
You don't know if her hand is just laying there, grabbing, fondling, or groping, so it's best left untagged.
Unless circumstances are made very obvious, you can include the subsequent tags (e.g., erection_under_clothing handjob or hand_in_underwear masturbation).

This should be tagged offscreen_sex (or obscured_sex when their entire body is in frame) and under_covers_sex. May be paired with suggestive when applicable.

I actually considered one of the hidden_xxx tags but didn't think they applied. I guess obscured_sex might work but... it's not certain that's actually what's happening. Although it makes sense. Oh well.