Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag alias #55136 facing_viewer -> looking_at_viewer has been rejected.
Reason: constant across the posts tagged with this, is they're all looking at the viewer.
EDIT: The tag alias facing_viewer -> looking_at_viewer (forum #320299) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
post #2919116
facing_viewer, but not looking_at_viewer. Their eyes can be closed or covered or looking aside while facing the viewer and not looking at them.
watsit said:
post #2919116
facing_viewer, but not looking_at_viewer. Their eyes can be closed or covered or looking aside while facing the viewer and not looking at them.
It was either going to be this or front view, they both got a high margin for the content to just get rid of the tag with maybe 2 posts ending up mistagged. It's an extremely pointless tag that as it seems scaliespe has the same view on, a few posts out of the majority isn't really a good argument.
versperus said:
It was either going to be this or front view, they both got a high margin for the content to just get rid of the tag with maybe 2 posts ending up mistagged.
I would rather alias it to front_view, since that’s what the words “facing viewer” actually mean, but… this happened…
I’d really rather imply it to something else than to create yet another invalid tag that probably nobody is going to keep an eye on, but so be it.
scaliespe said:
I would rather alias it to front_view, since that’s what the words “facing viewer” actually mean, but… this happened…I’d really rather imply it to something else than to create yet another invalid tag that probably nobody is going to keep an eye on, but so be it.
either works for me with weeding out the content that doesn't fit, this tag is just pointless.
The tag alias facing_viewer -> looking_at_viewer (forum #320299) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
