The tag implication #41576 princess_blossom_pepperdoodle_von_yum_yum_(fetch_with_ruff_ruffman -> blossom_(fetch_with_ruff_ruffman) has been rejected.

Reason: full real name to short version

EDIT: The tag implication princess_blossom_pepperdoodle_von_yum_yum_(fetch_with_ruff_ruffman -> blossom_(fetch_with_ruff_ruffman) (forum #317404) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Unless you meant to keep the original tag, you want an alias to replace the tag.

• You forgot the closing parenthesis
• This should be an alias, not an implication
• How likely is it that someone will try to tag the long version? It's not on any posts currently.
• I'm not sure which way this alias should go, since this site seems to prefer the long-ass version of names for some reason. For example: sheriff_mao_mao_mao, which is his title ("Sheriff") + first name ("Mao Mao") + last name ("Mao"). Mao Mao's last name was merely mentioned as a one-off joke in the actual show.

crocogator said:

• You forgot the closing parenthesis
• This should be an alias, not an implication
• How likely is it that someone will try to tag the long version? It's not on any posts currently.
• I'm not sure which way this alias should go, since this site seems to prefer the long-ass version of names for some reason. For example: sheriff_mao_mao_mao, which is his title ("Sheriff") + first name ("Mao Mao") + last name ("Mao"). Mao Mao's last name was merely mentioned as a one-off joke in the actual show.

Blossom_von_Yum_Yum, first name and last name, would be fair, but including the title and middle or nick names seems silly. Sheriff Mao Mao Mao could drop the sheriff bit.

furrin_gok said:
Unless you meant to keep the original tag, you want an alias to replace the tag.

Oops, my bad

The tag implication princess_blossom_pepperdoodle_von_yum_yum_(fetch_with_ruff_ruffman -> blossom_(fetch_with_ruff_ruffman) (forum #317404) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.