The bulk update request #1129 is pending approval.
remove implication duo_focus (30132) -> group (506830)
create implication trio_focus (1462) -> group (506830) # duplicate of implication #28681
remove implication threesome (63542) -> group_sex (113005)
remove implication sandwich_position (4211) -> group_sex (113005)
remove implication train_position (2885) -> group_sex (113005)
remove implication triangle_position (858) -> group_sex (113005)
remove implication spitroast (17428) -> group_sex (113005)
remove implication reverse_spitroast (428) -> group_sex (113005)
remove implication collaborative_footjob (278) -> group_sex (113005)
Reason: Per Watsit's comment. With trio being standalone, it no longer makes sense for these tags to implicate group, when they can just as easily be referring to a trio. Calling three people a 'group' seems a bit too generous for me, anyway. collaborative_footjob in particular should be unimplicated, none of the other collaborative_sex tags are implied.