The tag implication #38842 feral_penetrating_male -> male_on_feral has been approved.

Reason: Similar to Tag Implication: male_penetrating_feral -> male_on_feral ( forum #25084 ),
which was approved recently.

Wiki of feral_penetrating_male currently says:

Used for posts depicting a feral character penetrating a male character (such as anthro, human, humanoid or taur).

However, this does not apply if both involved are of the same form, such as feral_penetrating_feral.

RELATED:
But the tag wording(*) seems to have resulted in some confusion with some feral_on_feral images also getting tagged with feral_penetrating_male:
a) seven (7) uploads tagged with both
b) (32 uploads tagged with feral_penetrating_male)

(*) more obvious worded tag might be feral_penetrating_nonferal-male,
but then male_penetrating_feral would probably have to be updated to nonferal-male_penetrating_feral
(EDIT: and male_on_feral would get changed to something like nonferal-male_on_feral ... ouch! messy!)

I'm mostly fine with the tag wording and the wiki definition of feral_penetrating_male,
so if consensus still likes definition of feral_penetrating_male
we can remove feral_penetrating_male from the appropriate feral_on_feral uploads.

EDIT: The tag implication feral_penetrating_male -> male_on_feral (forum #310602) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

I'm in favor of updating the wikis to remove those same-form exclusion portions from the *_on_* and *_penetrating_* tags (the sections that exclude male_on_feral from being tagged on feral_on_feral, anthro_penetrating_female from being tagged on anthro_penetrating_anthro, intersex_on_humanoid from being tagged on humanoid_on_humanoid, etc).

The [gender]_penetrating_[gender] and [form]_penetrating_[form] tags don't exclude the use of [gender]_on_[gender] or [form]_on_[form] tags. It will be easier to tag posts (and harder to mistag posts) with these tags without those same-form exclusion portions. And searching for posts can be refined by using the [gender]_on_[form] tags to help find/remove more specific posts from the search query.

d.d.m. said:
I'm in favor of updating the wikis to remove those same-form exclusion portions from the *_on_* and *_penetrating_* tags

The point of the [gender]_on_[form] tags, and by extension the [gender]_penetrating_[form] and [form]_penetrating_[gender] tags, was to make finding different-form intimacy easier. male_penetrating_anthro, for example, makes it easy to find posts with a non-anthro (human, humanoid, feral) male penetrating an anthro (female, intersex, ambiguous). If male_penetrating_anthro could include anthro_penetrating_anthro, that makes it much harder to find such content, while also not being much improvement over male_penetrating+anthro_penetrated.

The tag implication feral_penetrating_male -> male_on_feral (forum #310602) has been approved by @bitWolfy.