The tag implication #38392 mimiff -> hybrid has been rejected.

Reason: basically

EDIT: The tag implication mimiff -> hybrid (forum #306944) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Related: forum topic #29067

Man, just use Chimera, that fits a hell of a lot better than "hybrid" for this sort of thing.

So You edited a wiki that said they're not hybrids into saying they are just so you could get your alias/implication sent through? They're just creatures with magical modifications, not hybrids.

votp said:
Man, just use Chimera, that fits a hell of a lot better than "hybrid" for this sort of thing.

post #2639469 post #2646604 post #2649631
post #2635641 post #2638073 post #2636597
Some of them certainly look like Chimera but others look like perfectly normal characters.

I said in the other thread that they should be lore or invalidated, but if Chimera can be that vague to cover extra horns then that could still work.

furrin_gok said:

Some of them certainly look like Chimera but others look like perfectly normal characters.

I said in the other thread that they should be lore or invalidated, but if Chimera can be that vague to cover extra horns then that could still work.

From the wiki; "For example, a wolf with a shark tail and fin. A crocodile with hooves. A fox with wings."

Chimera is the correct tag for this.

votp said:
From the wiki; "For example, a wolf with a shark tail and fin. A crocodile with hooves. A fox with wings."

That's for chimera. In comparison, for mimiff:

They might be similar to actual hybrids because they have animal-like features or resembling of actual mix of animals

This all seems to be someone's made-up pet concept with not-well-defined characteristics that any character can be labelled with as long as it doesn't look like a specific real-life species (or even if it does, if the difference just can't be seen).

The tag implication mimiff -> hybrid (forum #306944) has been rejected by @Millcore.