Topic: Bondage BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Leotheairwolf

Member

The bulk update request #736 is pending approval.

create implication tongue_bondage (78) -> bondage (126850)
create implication tongue_bondage (78) -> bound (184595)
create implication tongue_bondage (78) -> tongue (946576)
create implication hair_bondage (61) -> bondage (126850)
create implication hair_bondage (61) -> bound (184595)
create implication hair_bondage (61) -> hair (1966116)
create implication wings_tied (1613) -> bound (184595)
create implication self-bondage (251) -> bondage (126850)
create alias toe_bondage (58) -> toes_tied (1124)

Reason: List of bondage tags that should probably imply bondage and being bound.

The only one here I'm not sure of is wing_bondage and wings_tied Other body parts use the <body part>_tied format. Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on that.

Bregggo

Member

leotheairwolf said:
The bulk update request #736 is pending approval.

create implication tongue_bondage (78) -> bondage (126850)
create implication tongue_bondage (78) -> bound (184595)
create implication tongue_bondage (78) -> tongue (946576)
create implication hair_bondage (61) -> bondage (126850)
create implication hair_bondage (61) -> bound (184595)
create implication hair_bondage (61) -> hair (1966116)
create implication wings_tied (1613) -> bound (184595)
create implication self-bondage (251) -> bondage (126850)
create alias toe_bondage (58) -> toes_tied (1124)

Reason: List of bondage tags that should probably imply bondage and being bound.

The only one here I'm not sure of is wing_bondage and wings_tied Other body parts use the <body part>_tied format. Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on that.

I believe the implications should be Tied (a specific way of being bound) -> Bound -> Bondage (can refer to the state of being bound, as well as the acts of bindng and unbinding, neither of which would should be considered being "bound").
I'd otherwise agree.