The bulk update request #729 has been rejected.

create alias imminent_blowjob (6) -> imminent_oral (2969)
create alias imminent_fellatio (593) -> imminent_oral (2969)
create implication imminent_oral (2969) -> imminent_sex (42178)

Reason: Imminent_oral covers both blowjobs and fellatio, and oral is a type sex, so I figured I would add the implication.

EDIT: The bulk update request #729 (forum #306139) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

This seems wrong to me.

The oral tag covers more than just fellatio - it also includes cunnilingus and rimming, as well as some more specific acts like ball_licking.
In my opinion, imminent_blowjob should be aliased to imminent fellatio, but the latter should imply imminent_oral instead.

bitwolfy said:
This seems wrong to me.

The oral tag covers more than just fellatio - it also includes cunnilingus and rimming, as well as some more specific acts like ball_licking.
In my opinion, imminent_blowjob should be aliased to imminent fellatio, but the latter should imply imminent_oral instead.

I just figure that since Imminent_fellatio is such a underused tag, it's continued existence adds very little in terms of clarification.
Imminent_Blowjob and Imminent_Fellatio make up a combined total of only 97 posts

phd_in_feeling_bad said:
I just figure that since Imminent_fellatio is such a underused tag, it's continued existence adds very little in terms of clarification.
Imminent_Blowjob and Imminent_Fellatio make up a combined total of only 97 posts

Your point being?..
The blowjob tag is aliased to fellatio, which in turn implicates oral. I propose that we keep this structure consistent.

phd_in_feeling_bad said:
Reason: Imminent_oral covers both blowjobs and fellatio, and oral is a type sex, so I figured I would add the implication.

Not sure what happened to my previous message, but oral isn't necessarily sex. It could be imminent masturbation if a character's about to perform oral on themself (autofellatio, autocunnilingus).

watsit said:
Not sure what happened to my previous message

OP may have deleted the original thread, somehow, in order to create this updated thread? https://e621.net/forum_topics/28964 <- Access denied

crocogator said:
OP may have deleted the original thread, somehow, in order to create this updated thread? https://e621.net/forum_topics/28964 <- Access denied

Yes correct.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCT80HJWQ2A

Here is Watsit's comment if you'd like

watsit said:
I think aliasing the first two to imminent_oral would be better. There's imminent_anal too, so keeping the oral equivalent would make sense. Also while maybe rare-to-non-existing, imminent oral/anal action could be referring to imminent_masturbation, not necessarily imminent_sex.

Edit: I am just terrible at this whole aliasing and implicating business. After this gets rejected I think I'll just stick to plain old tagging.

I really appreciate all of your clarifications though!

phd_in_feeling_bad said:
Yes correct.

For future reference, you can edit BURs without having to delete the old thread and create a new one. On the BUR listing page, there should be an Edit link next to BURs you've created. After you've edited it, you can post a message in the thread saying you've updated it, and people can change their votes as appropriate.

The bulk update request #729 (forum #306139) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #8637 is active.

create alias imminent_blowjob (6) -> imminent_fellatio (593)

Reason: Following the blowjob alias

EDIT: The bulk update request #8637 (forum #409067) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #8637 (forum #409067) has been approved by @spe.