The tag implication #37719 food_transformation -> inanimate_transformation has been rejected.

Reason: Food is typically inanimate in my experience.

EDIT: The tag implication food_transformation -> inanimate_transformation (forum #305732) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Typically, yes, but not always.

That is to say, while a transformation into inanimate food is certainly possible, a transformation into a food creature would still technically count as food transformation.

jacob said:
Typically, yes, but not always.

Would that count as animate inanimate? The food creature wiki mentions it under "See also", but doesn't say whether it does or doesn't also apply.

Though I suppose a more pertinent question would be, does this count as food transformation?
post #2408071
Appletun is generally considered a food creature, but I don't think anyone would tag transformation into one as food transformation.

watsit said:
Would that count as animate inanimate? The food creature wiki mentions it under "See also", but doesn't say whether it does or doesn't also apply.

Though I suppose a more pertinent question would be, does this count as food transformation?
post #2408071
Appletun is generally considered a food creature, but I don't think anyone would tag transformation into one as food transformation.

It would count as animate_inanimate, yes, but if you check the wiki for inanimate_transformation, it specifically mentions that the finished form must be fully inanimate and immobile. As in, no longer a living, moving creature.

And yes, I would consider that food_transformation, as it's transformation into a food creature. I may be an outlier on that...we'll just have to wait for others to weigh in on the matter.

The tag implication food_transformation -> inanimate_transformation (forum #305732) has been rejected by @Millcore.