The tag implication #37613 black_areola -> dark_areola has been rejected.

Reason: Dark_areola is somewhat undertagged. Any black areola would also qualify as dark. I considered an implication for brown areola as well but there are light brown ones so that will have to be a case by case situation, same as distinguishing between light or dark versions of the other colors.

EDIT: The tag implication black_areola -> dark_areola (forum #305015) has been rejected by @Millcore.

While it appears to be a good idea, there is the potential for unusual cases where a post has black_areola which doesn't count as dark_areola. While most black_areola would also count as dark_areola, I'm not sure if any of the [color]_* tags have implications to the dark_* and light_* tags.

Though my assumption could be wrong, as I'm not very familiar with the dark_* and light_* tags. Additionally, the amount of unusual cases could be negligible or nonexistent. I don't quite have a decision yet over this implication.

As for populating the dark_areola tag, I can just go through black_areola and add dark_areola to a bunch of those posts.

The tag implication black_areola -> dark_areola (forum #305015) has been rejected by @Millcore.