Right now, the wiki page for hairy_balls says not only hairy balls (as in humanoid pubic hair) should be tagged with that tag, but balls with fur should be tagged with it too.
I feel that's unfortunate, as pubic hair and fur are different. I like both, but I'd expect hairy_balls to usually be on humans and not on anthros.
However, the pre-existing tags furry_balls, fuzzy_balls, and fluffy_balls have unclear boundaries. Should two of those be aliased to one of those? Or should they stay separate but with more clear usages mentioned on their wiki pages?
Topic: Question about hairy, furry, fuzzy, and fluffy balls tags.
Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
After having a look at all three of the tags you have requested an implication for there are very few posts tagged as such.
I feel that it may be a better to have a distinction between "furry balls" and "pubic hair on balls" but I think two blanket tags would be the best option over having several variants of implications.
For example:
These are balls with pubic hair:
and these are furry balls:
Something like that?
dragonfox69 said:
After having a look at all three of the tags you have requested an implication for there are very few posts tagged as such.I feel that it may be a better to have a distinction between "furry balls" and "pubic hair on balls" but I think two blanket tags would be the best option over having several variants of implications.
For example:
These are balls with pubic hair:
and these are furry balls:
Something like that?
Yep! I agree with this 100%.