The bulk update request #588 is active.

create implication penis_in_ass (104860) -> anal_penetration (380872)
create implication penis_in_ass (104860) -> penile_penetration (363284)
create implication penis_in_urethra (177) -> urethral_penetration (11128)
create implication penis_in_urethra (177) -> penile_penetration (363284)

Reason: Giving other penis_in_* tags attention...

See Also: topic #27843 (implicate penis_in_penis -> penis_in_urethra)

EDIT: The bulk update request #588 (forum #302961) has been approved by @Millcore.

So, um... any thoughts on this? I mean, penis_in_pussy is implicated to penile_penetration and vaginal_penetration...

It's throwing me off that 'penile_penetration' doesn't follow the same structure as the other x_penetration tags - it seems like it means 'penetration by a penis' rather than the 'penetration of an x' that the other x_penetration tags signify.

Is there still some ambiguity between x_insertion and x_penetration tags these days? Maybe they could be separated to define x_insertion as the insertion of an x into something and x_penetration as an x that has been penetrated by something. Provided that art involving typically penetrated organs doing the penetrating... even exists lol.

Regardless of my rambling, this seems like a reasonable implication to set up.

Yup. Sounds good to me.

The bulk update request #588 (forum #302961) has been approved by @Millcore.