The tag implication #32596 vaginal_pentration -> vaginal_penetration has been rejected.

Reason: Clearly a mispelling misspelling.

EDIT: The tag implication vaginal_pentration -> vaginal_penetration (forum #293372) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Normally when there's only one post on the misspelled tag, you should just fix it instead of suggesting an alias.

Also, it should be an alias.

You are mixing up the terms imply and alias.

Might as well alias it since it's already been suggested.

+1 for alias. There are also 4 other deleted posts with the tag, and it seems like a common enough typo.

The tag implication vaginal_pentration -> vaginal_penetration (forum #293372) has been rejected by @Millcore.

user_187249 said:
+1 for alias. There are also 4 other deleted posts with the tag, and it seems like a common enough typo.

Love l I didn't know back the