Topic: Are genital fluids enough to determine gender?

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

Example:

post #23078

I came across this while tagging, and I was going to tag it as ambiguous/ambiguous. It seems ambiguous in every way except for the visible fluids.

This caused me to pause, and consider whether the presence of genital fluids could be enough to determine the type of sex organ being obscured. It certainly has the consistency of cum. Pussy juice is usually clear. Is this always true? I don't know.

Is it enough to say that is a male?

Updated

I've seen things with much weaker justifications get tagged male. I'd go with male/ambiguous, but that might be just me.

Updated by anonymous

Those fluids are too vague. It's almost identical to the lucario's saliva. Also in general fluids are not enough to decide gender.

Updated by anonymous

Jacob said:
I've seen things with much weaker justifications get tagged male. I'd go with male/ambiguous, but that might be just me.

To be more clear, I meant that the pose, and where Pikachu's face is positioned, seem like justification enough for the male tag, to me. The fluids, however, are too ambiguous, as Pakattu said. I probably could've explained that better in my first post.

But, yeah, I've seen weaker justifications than how the two characters are placed.

Updated by anonymous

Jacob said:
To be more clear, I meant that the pose, and where Pikachu's face is positioned, seem like justification enough for the male tag, to me. The fluids, however, are too ambiguous, as Pakattu said. I probably could've explained that better in my first post.

But, yeah, I've seen weaker justifications than how the two characters are placed.

My response was directed to op. I would have quoted you if it was directed for you.

Updated by anonymous

Pakattu_suojakaasuun said:
My response was directed to op. I would have quoted you if it was directed for you.

Okay...? What exactly did I say that gave you the impression I thought you were talking to me?

Updated by anonymous

Jacob said:
Okay...? What exactly did I say that gave you the impression I thought you were talking to me?

Oh lol my bad, I looked at the thread wrong, disregard my comment.

Updated by anonymous

Pakattu_suojakaasuun said:
Oh lol my bad, I looked at the thread wrong, disregard my comment.

'sall good. Happens to everyone, from time to time.

Updated by anonymous

Many artists fail to draw consistency of liquids... consistently.

Updated by anonymous

Thanks for the input. I'm leaving it as male/ambiguous.

Updated by anonymous