Implicating playing_video_games → gaming
Link to implication

Reason:

literally the same thing

EDIT: The tag implication playing_video_games -> gaming (forum #281247) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

If they are literally the same thing, you want an alias, not an implication. Aliases are for merging tags. Implications are for 'Y should always be tagged when X is tagged, but they do NOT have the same meaning.'
(for example big_breasts implies breasts, while large_breasts is aliased to big_breasts)

I would be +1 on aliasing playing_video_games → gaming. Unfortunately, there aren't any instances of the former tag. Aliases generally are not approved if there isn't evidence of the 'wrong' version of the tag actually being used.

-1, alias playing_video_game to playing_videogame, which implies gaming. Or swap the aliases around, then implicate, since videogame shows up as not spelt correctly on my end.

savageorange said:
If they are literally the same thing, you want an alias, not an implication. Aliases are for merging tags. Implications are for 'Y should always be tagged when X is, but they do NOT have the same meaning.'
(for example big_breasts implies breasts)

I would be +1 on aliasing playing_video_games → gaming.

Gaming is a more broad term than video gaming, it can also apply to various physical games (from board & card games to physical interactions like Hide and Seek). An implication is currently better, though IMO playing_game might be a better term.

Siral_Exan said:
-1, alias playing_video_game to playing_videogame, which implies gaming.

All of that was already done back in January. I don't know why this thread exists.

Genjar said:
All of that was already done back in January. I don't know why this thread exists.

The plural playing_video_games is aliased to playing_videogame, but the singular playing_video_game is not. So, this one alias is all that's missing.

The tag implication playing_video_games -> gaming (forum #281247) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.