Implicating loop → animated
Link to implication

Reason:

A loop has to be an animation

EDIT: The tag implication loop -> animated (forum #206726) has been approved by @furrypickle.

Makes sense. There are just a few that need to be sorted in loop -animated. Don't really know what's going on with those

+1 overall, though!

Only major problem I can think of is what about slideshow? If there happens to be slide show, where the content loops on itself in continuation?

Mairo said:
Only major problem I can think of is what about slideshow? If there happens to be slide show, where the content loops on itself in continuation?

hmm dunno, animated to me is kinda like the catch all tag for all pics that aren't still images, basically all gifs, vids, and flashes. if there are posts that aren't still images but also don't get tagged animated it's a little annoying that there isn't a catch-all for for that. for me when I type in animated I'd like to see slideshow and interactive posts too :/
...
suggestion:
loop
inbetweening
animated
interactive
slideshow
implication->
non-still?

maybe that's a big ask but I'd still appreciate if that could be a thing

either way this implication probably shouldn't go through then

loop -animated has 12 images in it, 11 of which are still images.

This seems like a safe approval?

snowwolf said:
loop -animated has 12 images in it, 11 of which are still images.

This seems like a safe approval?

Great to see you again.　I now have a new name "Kurogi" :)

About loop -animated ：

• 3575354 is not a image but a loop and animated -- Added the tag.
• 3540520 (history) , 3517028 , 3441329 , 3220170 , 3114214 , 3049797 look like failed copy-paste from other posts -- Removed the tag.
• 3345056 and 3036901 -- I have no idea. Just a mistake? Removed.
• 3275802 (on chest) doesn't need a tag for that, probably.

• 3190639 and 3155918 -- What should I call them?

Anyway, There was/is no post using "loop" tag as for animation.
Given the meaning of both tags, This is now safe to approve, I think.

The tag implication loop -> animated (forum #206726) has been approved by @furrypickle.