Implicating art_collab → artist_collaboration
Link to implication
Reason:
So 10 days ago (on "Sep 18, 2019") art_collab, art_collaboration, multi_artist, multi-artist, and multiple_artists were all aliased to collaboration with alias "Reason" fields blank.
(and with NO associated forum link in "Forum Post" fields)
I suggest that those artist tags art_collab, art_collaboration, multi_artist, multi-artist, and multiple_artists no longer alias to collaboration,
but IMPLY to artist_collaboration. (with artist_collaboration maybe implying to collaboration)
collaboration wiki says:
General: collaboration
Images or Animations that were created, or worked on, by two or more Artists.
This can also apply to the image itself. If the characters are working together (in collaboration), this is a valid tag.
In my opinion, that is lumping two different types of collaboration together. (my objection is aliasing away a separate artist_collab* tag)
In my opinion,
there should be two (or 3) main collab tags:
artist_collaboration
character_collaboration
(and maybe collaboration).
If we keep plain collaboration as a tag (and don't disambiguate it to collaboration_(disambiguation)),
then both artist_collaboration and character_collaboration could imply to collaboration.
EDIT: And if a character_collaboration tag is ok,
then MAYBE
collaborative_fellatio (2058 posts)
collaborative_titfuck (336 posts)
collaborative_footjob (97 posts)
collaborative_handjob (60 posts)
collaborative_breastfeeding (35 posts)
and collaborative_cunnilingus (35 posts)
could imply to character_collaboration.
EDIT: The tag implication art_collab -> artist_collaboration (forum #278882) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.
Updated by auto moderator