Implicating partially_retracted_foreskin → foreskin
Link to implication

Reason:

It's in the name

EDIT: The tag implication partially_retracted_foreskin -> foreskin (forum #284224) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

You mean uncut?
I almost feel like uncut and foreskin should just be made into same tag considering how many simply use the tag foreskin to begin with.

Hmm, I feel mildly conflicted over this since I use both the uncut and foreskin tags when tagging posts. However, after checking through the wikis it does look like it would be better to merge the tags (probably by aliasing one tag to the other).

I'm thinking uncut would be better to keep as a better counterbalance to circumcised, though foreskin has several tags implicated to it (unretracted_foreskin, long_foreskin (already implicated to uncut), cum_in_foreskin) that would need to be shifted over to uncut. Though if foreskin is kept instead, uncut itself has several implications that would also need to be shifted over to foreskin.

Mairo said:
You mean uncut?
I almost feel like uncut and foreskin should just be made into same tag considering how many simply use the tag foreskin to begin with.

I didn't know there was an "uncut" tag. I'm not sure why there would be a difference between the two, foreskin is foreskin. These tags should just be merged.

D.D.M. said:
Hmm, I feel mildly conflicted over this since I use both the uncut and foreskin tags when tagging posts. However, after checking through the wikis it does look like it would be better to merge the tags (probably by aliasing one tag to the other).

I'm thinking uncut would be better to keep as a better counterbalance to circumcised, though foreskin has several tags implicated to it (unretracted_foreskin, long_foreskin (already implicated to uncut), cum_in_foreskin) that would need to be shifted over to uncut. Though if foreskin is kept instead, uncut itself has several implications that would also need to be shifted over to foreskin.

Having foreskin is the default state for human penises, so it would likely make sense for that to be the primary tag. If they end up being aliased it doesn't really matter though. As long as we don't have two entire groups of tags describing the same thing

Dedari said:
Having foreskin is the default state for human penises, so it would likely make sense for that to be the primary tag. If they end up being aliased it doesn't really matter though. As long as we don't have two entire groups of tags describing the same thing

Yeah, keeping foreskin may be better since most of the tags associated with it and uncut have 'foreskin' in their name. I guess which one ends up being kept largely depends on what folks prefer keeping (and it doesn't matter much to me which is kept), but I'm feeling more in favor of keeping foreskin.

However, several tag implications will still need to be moved over from uncut to foreskin.

Well, funny thing is that this discussion has been going on for years and even was final nail for one staff member to quit if I recall correctly.
forum #197265
forum #250488

Biggest problem seems to be that foreskin is a part that can be cut in process of circumsision, so those images would be also under foreskin tag as well as regular images where the penis is simply not mutilated uncut.

D.D.M. said:
Yeah, keeping foreskin may be better since most of the tags associated with it and uncut have 'foreskin' in their name. I guess which one ends up being kept largely depends on what folks prefer keeping (and it doesn't matter much to me which is kept), but I'm feeling more in favor of keeping foreskin.

However, several tag implications will still need to be moved over from uncut to foreskin.

We literally had this discussion 2 or so years ago, https://e621.net/forum/show/197265 where it was decided to flip Uncut into Foreskin, people got mad at parasprite for doing so and they quit but ultimately it was decided to get rid of uncut and foreskin being the same tag to allow foreskin to be tagged at all.

The project got started then dropped and ever since weve been in foreskin limbo.

Uncut needs to imply foreskin, several tags are broken as a result still of Uncut's old association and the entire thing is a mess.

https://e621.net/forum/show/250488

Foreskin Pull still implies Uncut which is an issue as presented in all the above threads, all of uncut's implications need to be moved to foreskin, uncut needs to imply foreskin itself if it continues to exist but it *doesnt* as people can blacklist the other state (being cut into) with the circumcision tag in their blacklist. This is however a huge dead horse. I hope this gets sorted.

The tag implication partially_retracted_foreskin -> foreskin (forum #284224) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Reason: Implication stuck as "queued".
Implication re-created.