Implicating pants_down → pants
Link to implication
Reason:
You need pants to have down, Dood ◠‿╹)~★
EDIT: The tag implication pants_down -> pants (forum #268055) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
Topic: Tag Implication: pants_down -> pants
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
-1. Also applies to shorts.
Updated by anonymous
Why not shorts_down in that case, Dood.
I know the idea seems a bit out there
but we also have Underwear_down
and panties_down as separate tags that
imply two different things so why not do the
same to pants. Giving peeps more of a choice
between the two. ╹‿╹)
Updated by anonymous
The tag implication pants_down -> pants (forum #268055) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.