Implicating zac_lime → zac
Link to implication

Reason:

name my character

EDIT: The tag implication zac_lime -> zac (forum #265365) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Thefurryking1 said:
Implicating zac_lime → zac
Link to implication

Reason:

name my character

Uh, no? Your character needs to BACK UP because that name is already taken by the League character who is about one million times as well known as your OC.

One character implying a broader character name? We don't need two character tags forced onto every single instance of the one who gets the initial tag.

And if you were to switch it to an alias, it'd still be wrong because, as Dyrone said, that's the name of other characters.

The tag implication zac_lime -> zac (forum #265365) has been rejected by @Millcore.